On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 09:57:57PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Marco Amadori wrote: > > This seems to be against DFSG n# 8. License Must Not Be Specific to Debian [0] > > You're absolutely right.. for main, but not for non-free. This is a matter for -legal, but anyway. No, he's not right. The problem is that it violates DFSG #1, "Free Redistribution", in particular "The license of a Debian component may not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software" So, indeed, this is not suitable for main, but not because of DFSG #8. The license given here was not given "for Debian" (AIUI), but it is too restrictive for main, so it's not actually relevant. :-) Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature