[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: haskell-edison



Hi James,

Thanks for reviewing another package.

Op do, 21-09-2006 te 17:31 +0100, schreef James Westby:
> Hi,
> 
> Apologies that it took me a while to get to this package, it is more
> complex than the other two, and put me off each time I came to it until
> now.
Hehe, 

It also took me some time to make it. 
> The package looks good, apart from two things,
> 
>   * When using ${binary:Version} or ${source:Version} you need to add a
>     versioned build-dep on dpkg-dev, see
>       http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/09/msg00228.html
>     Note that this may apply to your other packages, could you please
>     check? It only got added to my mental checklist recently.
Hmpf, 

Thanks for noticing this. I have updated the package. New version is
available from my repository [1].

>   * Your debian/copyright appears correct, but what worries me is that
>     the upstream files say
>       "License     :  BSD3; see COPYRIGHT file for terms and conditions"
>     but the COPYRIGHT file doesn't contain BSD3. Is it worth seeking
>     clarification?
Indeed. Again thanks for noticing. I will ask upstream. 

> The packages look good overall. I hope you find a sponsor.
Thanks.

Greetings Arjan

[1] dget http://moonshine.dnsalias.org/debian/unstable/haskell-edison_1.2.0.1-2_i386.changes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend


Reply to: