Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Christoph Haas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from
>>>> http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/museek-plus/museek+-0.1.1
>>>> 1.tar.bz2 differs in several places from the orig.tar.gz that you
>>>> provide.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I took one or two revision from svn that fixes license issues....
>>> Do you want me to apply them through dpatch ?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes please. Otherwise it's hard to understand what you patched and why. If
>> you really need to package a CVS/SVN version instead of the upstream's
>> last stable release then consider using an upstream version
>> like "0.99.4+cvs20060813".
>>
>>
> I know how to deal with svn version but we did too much changes to
> consider current trunk as "stable".
> That's why I just apply three svn revision to the latest stable release :)
>
>> The theory is that a user can get the upstream's tarball, apply Debian's
>> diff.gz patch and get a working package. The diff.gz contains everything
>> you have done. That user would be surprised if the diff.gz didn't work
>> with the upstream version you specify.
>>
>>
> It's now done but I have a strange problem I didn't noticed before. The
> first time I build the package I get "missing target
> install-python-museek2.3". If I restart package building it works fine.
>
> James is having a look, I hope he will understand what it is. Could you
> check the package too ? It's still available at mentors, same link than
> before.
>
> Thanks !
>
>
>
>> Christoph
>>
>>
>
>
>
It's now fixed :)
Reply to: