Re: binNMU safe and ${binary:Version} or ${source:Version}
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The BIG problem is how to get the next-version. Say you have version
> > 1.2-3. A binNMU would be 1.2-3+b1, a security release would be
> > 1.2-3etch1 (unless there was a binNMU).
>
> In the Great Scheme, these were supposed to become 1.2-3+etch1 instead of
> 1.2-3etch1 so that security NMUs would sort higher than binNMUs...
And they didn't because?
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: