On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:24:08 +0200 "Andreas Fester" <Andreas.Fester@gmx.de> wrote: > Antonio Ospite wrote: > [...] > > debpool is also a handy alternative for a private repository: > > > > http://packages.debian.org/experimental/devel/debpool > > > > with some improvement debpool can be _the_ debian repository > > manager for mortals :) > > I made some improvements to debpool (not forwarded to "upstream" yet), > see http://littletux.homelinux.org/debian/pool/main/d/debpool/ > > Among them are FAM support for a more responsive incoming queue > and support for multi arch repositories (especially handy for > i386/amd64). > > Things on my todolist are alignment with 0.2.3, optional GAMIN-support > instead of FAM and discussing my modifications with the original > author ;-) > Well, since debpool wants to keep dependencies at minimum I do not know if upstream author will accept your FAM support, let's try. As for multi arch repository I think it is a really good thing. Other features I miss from debpool are: - minimal pool tree (patch in BTS) - use of gpg-agent instead of keeping passphrase on fs (patch in BTS) - a command to delete packages from the repository (e.g.: debpool -d package_name) With those little changes it will be perfect for me :) Bye, Antonio. -- Web site: http://www.studenti.unina.it/~ospite Public key: http://www.studenti.unina.it/~ospite/aopubkey.asc
Attachment:
pgpirL31jiPQl.pgp
Description: PGP signature