[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: jlj package

On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 21:35 +0100, Michael Stevens wrote:
> #debian-mentors suggest this is unacceptably vague. Any suggested
> approaches to the upstream author? I've failed to get a response from
> him on other matters so far.

Contacting him is of course the best way to resolve the issue. I think
it works best if you suggest a concrete licence and ask if he agrees
that his software be distributed under that licence.

In this case, putting it in the public domain seems to match the intent
of the original author best, or a BSD licence.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: