On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:37:56PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > "Michael Tautschnig" <tautschn@model.in.tum.de> wrote in message > [🔎] 20060530174922.GC6483@l03.model">news:[🔎] 20060530174922.GC6483@l03.model... > That is a Serious bug, and is a FTBFS, so AIUI, it is RC. So it can be > filex in a NMU. However, According the the Developer's reference, only DD's > can NMU. If that is true, then sponsored NMU are not allowed. However, > tradition holds against this, as there have be numerous cases of sponsored > NMU's. There are no technical measures in place which *prohibit* developers from sponsoring NMUs. Nevertheless, the concept of a sponsored NMU is a broken one, because responsibility for the NMU lies with the uploader, not with the sponsoree. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature