Re: RFS: lttoolbox -- ITP #320931
Actually I fixed this problem :)
The updated packages are in the same place.
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 02:48 +1000, Ted Percival wrote:
> I guess the package name should be 'liblttoolbox1' or similar (no
> separator between package name and major soname version).
> I'm a packaging newbie so could well be wrong about this.
> Francis Tyers wrote:
> > There is one
> > warning from lintian that I can't quite figure out how to fix. "W:
> > liblttoolbox1: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames liblttoolbox-1.0-0"