Re: RFS: dnscruft
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:45:15PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> >On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:09:40AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >>Let's say that the previous post contained some references about the
> >>sites this package blocks. If I made murphy autolearn the package's
> >>name to mark it as spam, will I get a medal? :p
> No, indeed. Kilobyte now must clean up the mess he made. If a package name
> is a spam trigger than Debian will have major difficulties in dealing with
> that package.
One word does not spam make.
Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to say a word about Viagra at all, and it
would be against the 1st Amendment and thus illegal on servers in the US.
(Ok, this analysis may perhaps have some flaws :p).
Also, the word "dnscruft" has a spam ratio of no more than 50% (due to the
recent ITP), thus it doesn't contribute towards a given post's SA score.
On the other hand, though:
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on barad-dur
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,
GAPPY_SUBJECT,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=3.0.3
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on barad-dur.angband.pl)
You managed to score quite a bit just for using Lookout, more than half of
what I got for plenty of quotes from the crap sites dnscruft blocks. But
oh well, the original RFS was sent by pine, and it's non-free junk too.
But oh well, I need a way to somehow trick you to dget
and review/upload it :p
1KB // Rule #6: If violence wasn't your last resort,
// you failed to resort to enough of it.
// - The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Pirates