Re: RFS moodss

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS moodss
From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 18:21:45 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87irombn4m.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1146701627.11775.66.camel@darwin.os9.nl> (Thijs Kinkhorst's message of "Thu, 04 May 2006 02:13:47 +0200")
References: <b2445aae0604260125y728bc678gb6121a9002acd6c8@mail.gmail.com> <b2445aae0604260847m17ead01bobfb92c6dcbf20aac@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1146701627.11775.66.camel@darwin.os9.nl>

Thijs Kinkhorst <kink@squirrelmail.org> writes:

> debian/README.Debian: contains information that's interesting, but not
> really very important for people who install the package. I'd turn it
> into 'regular' documentation. README.Debian is more for major changes
> that influence the behaviour of the package since previous versions, for
> example.

Hm, are you confusing README.Debian with NEWS.Debian, maybe?  I think of
README.Debian as regular documentation.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS moodss
  - From: Thijs Kinkhorst <kink@squirrelmail.org>

References:
- Re: RFS moodss
  - From: Thijs Kinkhorst <kink@squirrelmail.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: Templayer - HTML Templating Library for Python
Next by Date: Re: ifpgui deb - review / upload
Previous by thread: Re: RFS moodss
Next by thread: Re: RFS moodss
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread