Re: RFS: checkinstall
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> The accepted practice is to have a symlink in /usr (or wherever) which
> points to the relevant path in /etc. That way, the program doesn't
> have to be hacked, if thats complicated, and users can edit whichever
> path they want (assuming their editor doesn't break the link).
But the symlink would be located at /usr/local, which can't be written by
> This is even mentioned in policy.
Where is that mentioned? I can't find it.