Re: RFS: treeline and treeline-i18n

[Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>]

* Miriam Ruiz [Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:31:22 +0100]:

Hi,

> My packages can temporarily be found at: http://baby.yi.org/packages/treeline/

  The packages look good. I can upload them, these are my only concerns:

  (1) As per upstream's require.html, the spell checker is not an
      absolute dependency, and aspell is normally preferred. What about
      this?:

        -Depends: python, python-qt3, ispell, ${misc:Depends}
        +Depends: python, python-qt3, ${misc:Depends}
        +Recommends: aspell | ispell
  
  (2) [minor suggestion, I don't mind leaving it as is] I'd personally
      leave the end of this sentence out of the Debian description.

        TreeLine is written in Python and uses the PyQt bindings to the Qt
      - toolkit, which makes it very portable.
      + toolkit.

  (3) 

> Package: treeline-i18n
> Description: translation files for treeline data manager

  Despite upstream shipping these two in separate tarballs, two separate
  binaries _and_ source seems an overkill to me. Perhaps other -mentors
  readers will disagree, but I'd look into shipping the translations in
  the treeline package itself (most packages do ship translations
  themselves, don't they?). This would mean repackaging, though.

  Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
                     Listening to: Lighthouse Family - Let it all change