Re: license question
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:17:55 +0100, Daniel Knabl <daniel@knabl.com> said:
> Hi, please have a look at the following license. In my eyes it is not
> a true BSD license, but also no Artistic license.
It is, verbatim, the 3-clause BSD license without the 3rd clause.
(Didn't check the disclaimer part, though.)
> But, I may be wrong. This would not be the first time :-/ Would it be
> OK to just include this license into the debian/copyright file? Or is
> it a common-license that I just don't understand?
It is probably best to include it in the debian/copyright file, since
it's not exactly the BSD license. Alternatively, you could say that
it's the BSD license without the 3rd clause, but IMHO, that's awkward.
> license:
[...]
> THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE FREEBSD PROJECT ``AS IS'' AND ANY
^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
Is this correct? Is the Virtual Exim team part of the FreeBSD project?
> EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FREEBSD PROJECT OR
> CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
> EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
> PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR
> PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
> LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING
> NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> Thank you for any hints Daniel
--
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
Reply to: