Hi! Is that a new linda test? IIRC I didn't got that warning before... ===== $ linda -i ppracer_0.3.1-4_i386.changes W: ppracer; The font ppracer-0.3.1/data/fonts/FreeSansBoldOblique.ttf in package ttf-freefont is considered to be a duplicate. The font shown above is considered to be a duplicate of a commonly available font. W: planetpenguin-racer-data; The font /usr/share/games/ppracer/fonts/FreeSansBoldOblique.ttf in package ttf-freefont is considered to be a duplicate. ===== Interesting I considered to split of this font when I made ppracer_0.3.1-3, but decided against it. Allthough the font's look the same (but the files are a bit different, and I don't know enough about ttf's to find out why), and ppracer worked very well with the font of in the ttf-freefont package I decided finally against a splitting it of: $ ls -sh /usr/share/games/ppracer/fonts/FreeSansBoldOblique.ttf 88K /usr/share/games/ppracer/fonts/FreeSansBoldOblique.ttf $ apt-cache show ttf-freefont|grep Installed-Size Installed-Size: 2424 Split of 88KB (ppracer contains only that single font file, no more), to depend on a 2.4MB package diesn't sound usefull to me. Any other opinion? Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature