Re: RFS: k9copy

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: k9copy
From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:15:16 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k6f13ot7.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4381DFAA.4030601@incase.de> (Sven Mueller's message of "Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:54:34 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 200511202112.48326.maxer@knio.it> <[🔎] 4381DFAA.4030601@incase.de>

Sven Mueller <debian@incase.de> writes:

> Also, if it is not lintian clean, you might need to set suitable
> overrides.

If the reason for the lintian messages is an actual bug in the package
(such as in this case, where there are missing man pages), I actually
prefer to see the lintian messages stay rather than using overrides.  A
lintian override to me means that the lintian message is wrong in this
particular case, not that it's a known bug.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: k9copy
  - From: Sven Mueller <debian@incase.de>

References:
- RFS: k9copy
  - From: Claudio Moratti <maxer@knio.it>
- Re: RFS: k9copy
  - From: Sven Mueller <debian@incase.de>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: k9copy
Next by Date: Re: RFS: k9copy
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: k9copy
Next by thread: Re: RFS: k9copy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread