Re: Upstream tar.gz in orig file à la dbs (was Re: dpatch & upstream source)

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Upstream tar.gz in orig file à la dbs (was Re: dpatch & upstream source)
From: François-Denis Gonthier <neumann@lostwebsite.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:48:19 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 200511022248.24412.neumann@lostwebsite.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87zmomtrun.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
References: <[🔎] 200511012315.38097.neumann@lostwebsite.net> <[🔎] 200511021154.01943.neumann@lostwebsite.net> <[🔎] 87zmomtrun.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

> More of an operational point of view,
> it's difficult to look at source code.
> Bug #250202 is the one to look at; which seems to have a solution.

With that page, I've got a much better understanding of what and the 
advantages and disadvantages of double-tarred source.

I'll look into svn-buildpackage, right about now.

Attachment: pgpOYHgsRTCXw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- dpatch & upstream source
  - From: François-Denis Gonthier <neumann@lostwebsite.net>
- Upstream tar.gz in orig file à la dbs (was Re: dpatch & upstream source)
  - From: François-Denis Gonthier <neumann@lostwebsite.net>
- Re: Upstream tar.gz in orig file à la dbs (was Re: dpatch & upstream source)
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: double-shlibs
Next by Date: RFS: bbsload, bbrun, tkpaint, auctiongallery, wlassistant
Previous by thread: Re: Upstream tar.gz in orig file à la dbs (was Re: dpatch & upstream source)
Next by thread: Re: dpatch & upstream source
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread