skaller wrote on 30/07/2005 19:08: > On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 08:55 -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote: >>You can test this yourself to see that it works correctly. For example, >>try to install "cfengine2" (Conflicts: cfengine) and then "cfengine". > > > I'll take your word for it .. in this case, why is there > a problem with the udev thing? I don't know of any problem with udev. Where from do you gather that there is any problem with udev? > I thought that the problem > arose from the fact this didn't work .. but now you > say that isn't the case .. then I can't understand > the original problem, and why 'no-X' package was > suggested.. :) It was suggested to provide a way to say: I don't recommend to use X with a version lower than y.z. Currently, you can _conflict_ with X (<y.z), but you can't say "Recommends: !X (<y.z)" to recommend not using X with a version lower than y.z. Hmm, that explanation doesn't look too good, but I hope you still understand it. cu, sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature