On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 01:01 -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > Failing to build on an architecture that it has never been built on is > not release-critical and will not keep your package out of testing. > You should expect to get non-release-critical bugs about it however. Ah, good to hear. This wasn't the impression I got from my sponsor, will have to tell him. > Generally, you can ask for help on the architecture specific lists > like debian-sparc. (Ask for cc if you arn't subscribed.) In the case > of sparc, I could help debug it. Excellent, I suspect fixing sparc would also fix mipsel since they both fail in the same place (building the docs). nsis uses halibut to generate its docs, and includes a modified copy of halibut src in the orig.tar.gz, which is built during the build process - Docs/src/bin/halibut/makefile - patched by one of the dpatches. The halibut binary is segfaulting when building the docs - Docs/src/build.sh -- bye, pabs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part