El d�14/03/2005 a 10:46 Steve Kemp escribio ...
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:57:21PM +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote:
>
> > > > while on the other archs the package was built correctly.
> > > > What's the problem?
> > >
> > > Does your package build-depend upon xlibs-dev?
> >
> > Ehm... no!
> >
> > I still cannot understand why it could be built on the other archs.
>
> It does seem strange, maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree.
>
> > Also, how could I find "missing" build-dep like this without wasting buildd time?
>
> The ideal thing to do in this case would be to look at the config.log
> which will show you exactly why the ./configure script couldn't find
> X.
>
> If you have access to a host you could perform a manual build there
> and try it out.
>
> If not add a 'cat config.log' into the debian/rules and wait for
> it to be rebuilt.
>
You can always use debuild and check the logs later.
-Rudy
--
Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org ,''`.
http://www.apesol.org - http://www.debian.org : :' :
GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 `. `'
`-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature