Le Lun 7 Mars 2005 06:53, pabs a écrit : > Hi, > > I was wondering if there is any info about best practice in the > situation where upstream source packaging doesn't use the standard > foo-0.1.2/ inside of foo-0.1.2.tar.gz scheme? > > I suppose repacking the tarball/etc before using dh_make is enough, > but is there a standard way to make this a bit more automated for new > upstream releases? > > Another, question: why do some orig.tar.gz files contain a tarball > that looks to be the upstream source, instead of being a copy of the > upstream source? gaim for example. you may want to use cdbs (tarball.mk) that may offer all the kind of things you want. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpnT3uOvlLVr.pgp
Description: PGP signature