Russ Allbery wrote:
> The package looks fine, except that you didn't need to repackage the
> upstream source. The package build tools don't care in the slightest what
> directory the upstream source unpacks into; they just care that the tar.gz
> file be named appropriately. So you should be able to just rename the
> tar.gz with the appropriate version and everything should be happy.
> If you could rebuild the package with the virgin upstream tarball, I'd be
> happy to sponsor it. (While you're rebuilding it, you may want to fix the
> last two changelog entries -- I think you meant debian/copyright as the
> file modified, not debian/changelog.)
Ok Updated the package.