[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Rationale behind script-not-executable lintian warning

On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 12:25 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Then it seems logical to me that an override would be in order.  However, I
> don't understand what the check is for, if not for cases like these.  So my
> logic may very well be incorrect.

Many tests document a short rationale in their description; it would be
good to add this for tests where it doesn't exist. For example by
sending patches to the BTS.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: