On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 03:58:15AM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > El d?a 20/09/2005 a 02:41 W. Borgert escribio ... > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 01:24:20AM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > > > Hi, I've almost finished the port to gtk2 of one of my packages[0], my > > > question is regarding to the package versioning since upstream seems > > > pretty MIA and I'm unlikely to push it upstream but I'd like to have > > > this on Debian. So how should I go add a -gtk2, as I'm doing now, to > > > the version number or put this as another package and replace the > > > former? > > > > Is there a need to keep the GTK+ 1 version anyway? I would > > throw the old stuff away... > > No, I missed to tell that the Debian source package[0] has been > heavily modified so it differs with upstream's latest release. > I was thinking just to have the gtk2 port inside diff.gz as another > Debian source hack, probably I'll go that way. With upstream MIA but need for them anyway (since there is a large diff.gz), it may also be an option to fork the code and become upstream yourself. Bye, Bas Wijnen -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature