On 9/13/05, Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es> wrote:
> * Steve Langasek [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:02:55 -0700]:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
>
> > > > * debian/rules:
> > > > DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
> > > > This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it does
> > > > build-depend on build-essential, etc.). Please fix that.
> > > I don't agree, at least it works.
>
> > No, it doesn't. Packages have ended up with RC bugs before as a result
> > of cdbs changing the build-dependencies of the package in one of the
> > standard debian/rules targets, and I strongly discourage maintainers
> > from using this misfeature of cdbs.
>
> And ftpmasters will now actively discourage its use, by rejecting
> packages that use it. As per [1].
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg00011.html
>
I applied all the suggests you all mentioned in this thread, Thanks all.
This is the new changes[1]. and I have upload it to mentors[2], now
it's linda and lintian clean.
[1]
Description:
qterm - BBS client for X Window System written in Qt
Changes:
qterm (0.4.0pre3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* debian/copyright:
- new fsf address
- update copyright information
* debian/menu: fix format
* debian/control: update package description
* debian/README.Debian: how to setup detecting location from ip environment
* debian/qterm.dbk: new manpage in docbook format
* use dpatch to manage patches
- 01-amd64.dpatch: make qterm buildable under amd64.
[2] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qterm/
Thanks
--
LI Daobing