On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:52:38PM +0200, Fr?d?ric BOITEUX wrote: > I've now a new version, 2.2-0.1, ready to be uploaded, but the official maintainer which > has orphaned the package don't have any time to do it. According to the bts, there's only a RFH, not an O. Did he forget to do this? > - How can I do to avoid removing package from archive ? Normally, retitling the RFA or O bug into ITA should help. However, there is no such bug, as there is only a RFH. If he really meant to orphan the package, you can retitle it to ITA (but discuss this with him before doing it). Also write a comment in the bug report about the situation, explicitly saying it shouldn't be removed, because you want to adopt it. Bye, Bas Wijnen -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature