[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: kmuddy -- advanced MUD client for KDE



On Thursday 11 August 2005 10:14 pm, Andrew Saunders wrote:
> The documentation in doc/en appears to be covered by the terms of the
> GNU Free Documentation License which is widely considered to be
> non-free[1]. That docbook file'll need to be either relicensed,
> removed or split off into its own package in the non-free section
> before kmuddy can go into main.
>
> [1] http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html

Thank you; I didn't think to check the documentation license, but that's 
definitely an issue now with GFDL being decided as non-free. I've contacted 
upstream about relicensing -- otherwise, I think there's enough documentation 
there to justify splitting the docs to non-free.

-- 
Ryan Schultz
-> The meek shall indeed inherit the Earth -- the rest of us will take to the 
stars.

Attachment: pgpjj39J07cxT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: