On 20050729T014933-0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > 1) What would be the corresponding Debian version? Should it be > 0.2.2-1-1 or should i pretend the upstream's version is 0.2.2.1 and name > the debian version to be 0.2.2.1-1? As others have mentioned, the former is the correct way. > The maint-guide currently is silent about this problem. But if there is > some other documentation available which helps in this regard, I will be > happy to read it. The policy defines this unambiguously. I encourage you to read http://www.nl.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version (as well as the Policy manual in its entirety). -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Debian developer http://kaijanaho.info/antti-juhani/blog/en/debian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature