[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: html-xml-utils (W3C simple HTML and XML utilities)



On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 06:21:27PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Beverly Davis [Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:21:41 -0600]:
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:41:10PM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
> 
> > > > I have prefixed the names of the executables with "hx_" to try to avoid
> > > > name conflicts (this was in the upstream TODO file).
> 
> > No, he hasn't done that yet.  I went ahead and did it though because
> > otherwise some of them would have rather common sounding names, such as
> > "extract", "index", and "count".  Is this a problem?  What should I do?
> 
>   I think you did the right thing, and it's not a problem at all given
>   that upstream will rename the same way eventually.
> 

And I think it is not wise to have W3C software in Debian
that differs from W3C software.

Let me known when upstream has actually include the hx_ prefix.


Geert Stappers
DD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: