Re: Multiple changelogs in upstream tarballs

[Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de>]

Hi Loïc.

I think this is mostly a matter of taste, but here is my opinion.

Loïc Minier wrote:
>  I'm considering the installation of these changelogs via dh_install.
Sounds like a good idea.

>  - should I try merging the upstream changelogs instead of installing
>    multiple changelogs?  I don't like that option because I change the
I wouldn't more or less for the reasons you give.

>  - how should I name changelogs?  Should I put them under
>    /usr/share/doc/package/changelogs/ and respect the upstream
>    hierarchy, or should I name them "linux-changelog" etc.?
How about changelog.something.gz?

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/