Re: Multiple changelogs in upstream tarballs
I think this is mostly a matter of taste, but here is my opinion.
Loïc Minier wrote:
> I'm considering the installation of these changelogs via dh_install.
Sounds like a good idea.
> - should I try merging the upstream changelogs instead of installing
> multiple changelogs? I don't like that option because I change the
I wouldn't more or less for the reasons you give.
> - how should I name changelogs? Should I put them under
> /usr/share/doc/package/changelogs/ and respect the upstream
> hierarchy, or should I name them "linux-changelog" etc.?
How about changelog.something.gz?
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/