[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Shared library concern



On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:43:08PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2005, at 20:24, François-Denis Gonthier wrote:
> >The soname doesn't seem to be the problem in that case:
> >E: codeblocks: sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib
> >usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.1.0-beta6
> 
> ``1.0-beta6'' is not a SONAME. Please read the Debian Library Packaging 
> Guide.
Note also that lintian source is pretty easy to figure out; in the
case of this message, which I think everyone runs into, it asserts
that $libraryname=~m/-$soname.so$/ (depreciated) or
$libraryname=~m/.so.$soname$/ ("appreciated").  For each $libraryname
in the set of files for which $(file $filename)=~m/shared object/i, or
something similar.

Justin



Reply to: