Re: RFS: tinywm - Ridiculously tiny window manager
Hi,
1.
> > 2.
> > Is the priority '50' for x-window-manager alternatives
> > correct? How did you calculate the value?
> >
> I did't notice this .
> I changed this priority to 10.
> The reason for this WM is that it is thought that priority
> levels are lower than other WM when the reason examined the
> priority of other WM.
According to: '11.8.4. Packages providing a window manager'
It should be 20
Did I miss something ?
2. I've sent a separate mail about your description.
With these points fixed, your package looks good that I could sponsor.
regards,
junichi
--
Junichi Uekawa, Debian Developer
17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/
Reply to: