[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: setserial -- Controls configuration of serial ports (2nd try)


On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:30:35AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> > setserial (2.17-41) unstable; urgency=low
> > 
> >   * Closes: #276667: Czech translation of setserial debconf messages
> >     Already fixed in 2.17-40, just closing bug report.
> Don't do this.  If it isn't fixed in the changes described by this
> changelog, don't close the bug in the changelog.  Instead, mail
> nnn-done@bugs.d.o and describe the reason why it should be closed as "fixed
> in 2.17-40 but not closed at upload".

Thanks for pointing this out. I've done it only because I have seen this
in some other packages. Now I went back to developers reference [5.8.4]
and it's stated clearly there. Now the bug is closed.

> >   * New maintainer. (Closes: #285355: RFA: setserial -- Controls
> >     configuration of serial ports)
> I'd be inclined to put this entry first, as it is common practice.

How about folowing:

setserial (2.17-41) unstable; urgency=low

  * New maintainer. (Closes: #285355: RFA: setserial -- Controls
    configuration of serial ports)
  * Added printing of 'divisor' when 'spd_cust' is set and -G
    option is used. Based on patch attached by Ian Abbott 
    <ijabbott@users.sourceforge.net> to bugreport [447228] 
    at SourceForge.net
  * In upstream README file corrected chkconfig option -add to --add

 -- Jan Zizka <ziza@klubicko.net>  Wed,  9 Mar 2005 20:51:16 +0200

Originally I had that entry first, but seems that I have changed
the order during some editing (thow I used 'dch' mostly).

I have uploaded corrected sources to:

deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free

BTW was I supposed to increase the version number to something 
like 2.17-41.1 if previous package would have been put to official

Thanks :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: