pabs wrote: > I was wondering if there is any info about best practice in the > situation where upstream source packaging doesn't use the standard > foo-0.1.2/ inside of foo-0.1.2.tar.gz scheme? I thought that dpkg-source took care of renaming the directory that the upstream tarball produced? Certainly it's always done that for me. Just make sure that you rename the directory and the tarball before you run debuild (or similar) to generate the source package, and it should Just Work. Cameron.
Description: Digital signature