On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 12:15 -0500, Hubert Chan wrote: > >>>>> "martin" == martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> writes: > > [...] > > martin> Don't get me wrong: I am not against the inclusion of wmansied, > martin> but I want to make sure that the maintainer has considered > martin> whether it would be a valuable addition, or whether s/he simply > martin> uploads whatever s/he can find. > > Perhaps the question is better phrased: what makes WMAnsiEd > better/sufficiently different from the other ANSI editors already in > Debian? Or why would someone want to use WMAnsiEd instead of one of the > other ANSI editors? And if it is better, is there another package we can remove because its features are entirely a subset of WMAnsiEd's? -- Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part