[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: WMAnsiEd - An ANSI/ASCII editor

also sprach Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> [2005.03.04.0015 +0100]:
> Because the needs of different people are different, too.

I am perfectly aware of that, but the same argument is used every
time to upload a new package to Debian. I fundamentally agree, of
course, that choice is important, but I am also concerned about the
ever increasing size of our archive.

> Why do we have more than one X window manager?

Arguably, most of the actually have larger user basis than ASCII
editors will ever get. Then again, some could probably be removed.

Don't get me wrong: I am not against the inclusion of wmansied, but
I want to make sure that the maintainer has considered whether it
would be a valuable addition, or whether s/he simply uploads
whatever s/he can find.

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: