Re: Advice in 3 packages

[Antonio Ognio <aognio@gmail.com>]

> > The name I choosed for the packages is: liblog4sh-shell. I guess it correctly
> > reflects it's a library for the shell and it's name is "log4sh". Is this right?
> 
> Looks fine to me.
Nice. I keep it then.
 
> available. So if this does work out cleanly, it would be cool if you
> could make sure that all the documentation available in <package>/html
> is also available either as plaintext file(s) or as manpage(s).

I forgot to mention I also included a plain text version. 
 
> > I tried to do the this by messing a bit with debian/<package.doc-base
> > but didn't got it to work. Need some help on how to do this.
 > Just copy it to DESTDIR/usr/share/doc/<package>/html in the Makefile's
> install target or (IMHO preferably) in debian/rules at about the time
> the Makefile is called for the install target.

Uhm. I'll experiment a bit with this, guess I got a clue.

> Well, neither debian/rules nor the original Makefile should issue errors
> during the build. If there is no "build" target in the Makefile, either
> add it (empty) or remove the call to it in the build(-stamp) target of
> debian/rules.

I'll check this issue then.
 
> > in Debian I guess gruler makes sense. Shoud i rename the package to
> > 'gnome-screen-ruler'??
> 
> I personally wouldn't do that. Just keep the package name to gruler and
> use Gnome Screen Ruler only where a longer project name or description
> is sensible.
Nice. So it stays that way.

> Apart from the license issue (you should really ask debian-legal about
> that), I wonder what sets it apart from logrotate?

I've researched a bit this and Debian also includes vlogger and cronolog.
I'll compare the feautes in more detail and make my mind if a debianized
httplog makes sense.
 
Antonio.