[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Advice in 3 packages



>>>>> "Antonio" == Antonio Ognio <aognio@gmail.com> writes:

[...]

Antonio> httplog
Antonio> -------

Antonio> Main problem I have with this package is it's license: Free
Antonio> Software License. Haven't yet realized if this is a custom
Antonio> license from the upstream author or something else but quite
Antonio> little known. The relevant parts are here:

If you want a real opinion, you should ask on debian-legal, but here are
my non-professional (unprofessional? ;-) ) opinions.

Antonio>                              TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Antonio>    1. You may make copies of the Software.

No problems here. ;-)

Antonio> 2. You may prepare derivative works based on the Software,
Antonio> provided the following conditions are met: i) All modifications
Antonio> to the Software must be prominently declared in the same file
Antonio> as the modification, and must include the date of the
Antonio> modification and the person who made the modification.

A bit of a strange condition (requiring changes to be documented), IMHO,
but I don't think that makes it non-free.

Antonio> 3. You have the right to make available to the public copies of
Antonio> the Software or derivative works of the Software, provided the
Antonio> following conditions are met: i) Copies in any form must retain
Antonio> all copyright notices, all notices that refer to this License,
Antonio> and must include this License, without modification.

Pretty standard condition, I think.

Antonio> ii) The name of any Copyright Owner may not be used to endorse
Antonio> or promote products either containing, or derived from the
Antonio> Software.

Again, I think this is fairly standard.  A similar clause is in the BSD
license.

Antonio> This means the package would go in 'contrib' or 'non-free'??

It looks free to me.  My only possible concern would be clause 2i.  But,
again, you should probably ask debian-legal before you try to get this
into Debian.

BTW, 'contrib' is only for software that depends on non-free software.
So unless httplog depends on non-free software, it would go in main, if
the license is free, or non-free, if the license is non-free.

-- 
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.



Reply to: