On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:09:40AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:45:27AM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote: > > There are about 10 of these png files that shouldn't be there. Upstream > > knows about this and will eventually get round to it. Can the package > > still be accepted even with these errors? > > Can, but probably shouldn't. Move the images to where they're supposed to > be (/usr/share) and modify the rest of the package to look for them there. > If that's not practical, then symlink. As long as upstram is ultimately planning on fixing this, I would leave the images where they are *unless* they exist in a directory by themselves (or with other data that should be shared). I'm just more comfortable with that; otherwise a bad symlink could potentially cause a crash (if the symlink is a whole directory though, you're almost guaranteed to notice it before a user does). IANADD, Justin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature