On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 22:15, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:59:34PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > But shipping .la files in non-dev packages should still be a hanging > > > offense. > > > Plugins using libltdl probably need them ... though not until some of > > the more exotic ports come to fruition. > > > "Debian Solaris" anyone? :o) > > How about if we just not allow ports of Debian based on such > bass-ackwards linkers? > Are you listening Robert Millan? :-) (I'm actually not convinced the BSD linker can do full-depth dependency trees.) Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part