Hi Justin! Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:33:46PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote: > > Carlos Parra Camargo <carlospc@gmail.com>: > >- Contained XPMs stand under BSD-like license, not GPL, see ./etc/COPYRIGHT.xpm > >I think copyright file should reflect this, although relicensing (under GPL) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > is also ok. > Huh? Hehe? ;-) > * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > * all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > And what about the sentence above: "* deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the * rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, ..." > I don't think its okay to just stick it with a different license > notice, if that's what you mean. > Isn't this covered by "sublicense", is it? Kindly regards, Erik BTW: I'm on list, so please don't send a CC. -- www.ErikSchanze.de ********************************************* Bitte keine HTML-E-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Limit: 100 kB *
Attachment:
pgpXjaNCNbCxH.pgp
Description: signature