[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: package xsok

Hi Justin!

Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:33:46PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > Carlos Parra Camargo <carlospc@gmail.com>:
> >- Contained XPMs stand under BSD-like license, not GPL, see ./etc/COPYRIGHT.xpm
> >I think copyright file should reflect this, although relicensing (under GPL) 
>                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >    is also ok.
> Huh?
Hehe? ;-)

>  * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
>                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  * all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
And what about the sentence above:
"* deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
 * rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, ..."

> I don't think its okay to just stick it with a different license
> notice, if that's what you mean.
Isn't this covered by "sublicense", is it?

Kindly regards,


BTW: I'm on list, so please don't send a CC.

 www.ErikSchanze.de *********************************************
 Bitte keine HTML-E-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Limit: 100 kB *

Attachment: pgp7w4CCSUB9A.pgp
Description: signature

Reply to: