[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS schoolbell - A calenaring server for schools

* Brian Sutherland (jinty@web.de) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:48:37PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > .so files?  Should it be libschoolbell and libschoolbell-dev?
> > 
> > Indeed.
> These few .so files are imported from zope and maybe slightly modified.
> So there is probably no use for people to build against them. 
> Would a -dev be required?

Hrm, I suppose probably not..  The -dev is for header files (mainly,
really) and if there aren't any (because it's not meant to be built
against) then I suppose it's reasonable to not have one.

Make sure to figure out what kind of relationship there is between the
.so (Is it really .so, or .so.1.2.123 or something?) and the binaries
that link against it.  Do the versions have to match exactly?  How do
you handle ABI changes to the .so?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: