[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFA: atftp

On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:30:37AM -0400, Rodrigo Henriquez M. wrote:
>Package: wnpp
>Severity: normal
>I used atftp a lot and I would like to be the
>new mantainer for this package.
>-- System Information:
>Debian Release: testing/unstable
>  APT prefers testing
>  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
>Architecture: i386 (i686)
>Kernel: Linux 2.6.0-1-686
>Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8

There is a problem with your bug report 240198 [0].

You should have changed the title of bug report 227258 [1] instead of
creating a new bug report.

Please merge bug reports 240198 and 227258.

The title of bug report 240198 should be:

ITA: atftp -- Advanced TFTP client

However, it has been set to "RFA: atftp", wich doesn't correspond to
your intent to adopt (ITA) the package.

RFA, request for adoption, is used by the current package maintainer to
ask for somebody to adopt one of his/her packages.

To change the titles of both bug reports and merge them, send an email
to control@bugs.debian.org with the following subject (or something similar):

wnpp: merge and retitle 240198 227258 ITA: atftp -- Advanced TFTP client

and with the following five lines in the body of the message:

package wnpp
retitle 240198 ITA: atftp -- Advanced TFTP client
retitle 227258 ITA: atftp -- Advanced TFTP client
merge 227258 240198

You could put anything else after the fith line. For more information
see [2] and [3].

Please read [4] if you haven't done so.

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/240198
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/227258
[2] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
[3] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
[4] http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux      | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/    | http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-                          |

Attachment: pgprQl7MS5UTk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: