Re: Advice needed for packaging sigcperl library and SigC perl module
Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de> schrieb:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2003 16:43 schrieb Christoph Berg:
>> Re: Advice needed for packaging sigcperl library and SigC perl
>> module [Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>, Wed, May 14, 2003 at
>> 03:36:08PM +0200, <200305141536.08243.konqueror@gmx.de>]
>>
>> > - libsigcperl-0.2 (the helper library)
>> > - libsigcperl-dev (the development files)
>> > - libsigc-perl (its a binary perl module)
>>
>> Why not libsigc-perl-0.2 and libsigc-perl-dev to be consistent?
>
> Hmm, the upstream name of this is "sigcperl" and wouldn't this naming
> scheme even more irritating ?
Definitely. I would expect libsigc-perl to be some virtual package for
installing libsigc-perl-0.2 or libsigc-perl-0.1.3 or
libsigc-perl-bla.
Why does the library have the version in its number, but not the
development package? What about the development packages for the to-come
library libsigcperl-0.4?
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: