[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The Debian Mentors Project



On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Debian Mentors Project
> 
> > The mentors core-team is: 
> >   Christoph Haas (ChrisH)        <email@christoph-haas.de>
> >   Ivo Marino (eim)               <eim@mentors.debian.net>
> >   Daniel K. Gebhart (con-fuse)   <dkg@con-fuse.org>
> >   Christoph Siess (CHS)          <chs@geekhost.info>
 
> Uh, as far as I can tell, of the above only Daniel is even in the
> n-m queue; Christoph, Ivo and Christoph appear to not be developers,
> applicants, or even sponsored maintainers of any packages in the archive.
 
> ]  In longer terms: only registered Debian developers (DD) are allowed to
> ]  upload packages directly into the official Debian distribution. But
> ]  becoming a DD is a long and painful way.
 
> Daniel applied to be a maintainer on 2003-03-18 and was assigned an
> application manager nine days ago, according to nm.debian.org. Why are
> we giving debian.net addresses to people who don't want to go through
> the "pain" of authenticating themselves to Debian, demonstrating they
> no what they're doing, and agreeing with Debian's principles?

I do not think that the fact that they have not applied yet,
can be taken as sign that they "don't want to go through
the "pain" of authenticating themselves to Debian, demonstrating
they no what they're doing, and agreeing with Debian's principles".

They might simply not feel ready, one should start the NM process,
when (s)he is ready for T&S and PP and has an advocate. NM is just the
"final exam", and no "How to be DD in 6 months" course.
               cu andreas
-- 
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"

Attachment: pgpYIMOFlPdhJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: