Hi
I imagine a simple suggests with a note on the README pointing to the
documentation on doc-linux-{html,text} would be fine.
I don't think using the extra space for duplicate documentation is a
good idea, but maybe there's a more gentle solution...
PS.:(pt_BR) eu me sinto um idiota escrevendo inglês pra gente do
Brasil... mas tudo bem...
On Seg, 2003-07-07 at 07:22, Michelle Ribeiro wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> My package upstream's have a doc, about the package installation and configuration at LDP. So, this doc is also in the doc-linux-html package.
>
> Should I release the doc html and txt version with my package?
> Make doc-linux-html a dependency doesn't seems good to me due the size.
>
> Best cheers,
>
> --
> --
> Michelle Ribeiro
--
Leo Costela
<costelaaa@ig.com.br> | <costela@debian.org> | <costela@pop.com.br>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6 CDFF 6535 192F B5B6 5921 2262 D36F 7ADF 9466
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part