On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:05:05PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > > So, as long as upstream hasn't agreed to change this (or even stated > > they never will), what should I do? In the special case where I came > > across this, it's even worse: The development versions for to-be 1.2 are > > numbered 1.2-1 to 1.2-4, and I fear the release will be just 1.2. > > The usual way is using "pre1", "pre2", ..., "rc1", ..., "rel". As a > matter of fact, this sorts nicely. Doesn't this have the problem that debian considers 1.2pre1 to be a later version than 1.2? -- David Roundy http://www.abridgegame.org
Attachment:
pgpTnd70eidcO.pgp
Description: PGP signature