Re: RFC: Merging sponsoring system with wnpp
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:59:35PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > > > For Sponsorship?
> > > > > Comments?
> [...]
> > Anyone else have anything to say? Should I cc -policy and let them
> > debate it?
>
> shouldnt that kind of thing go in the developers reference? maybe a
> wishlist bug should be filed.
>
> do any of the developers disagree with joe's proposal?
I think that WNPP is an awkward place to handle sponsorship, and that a
home in the new-maintainer database would be much cleaner. See my other
post.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: