On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Joe Nahmias wrote: > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request > > For Sponsorship? > > Comments? > > AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also > include ITA in this case, the ITA could be retitled to RFS. > and possibly RF-yet-another-S for packages already in the archive in > case a previous sponsor lacks time or similar. you could file a new RFS bug in this case, or just ask on -mentors, as the consensus decides. > Also, your assuming that DDs intending to package are willing to sponsor. yes, he is. but it seems that the system would work either way. -- gram
Attachment:
pgpJ6bhzsbkgp.pgp
Description: PGP signature