[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is sid recommended?



On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:08:08AM +0100, Volker Sturm wrote:
> Hi,
> if I want to get into software development for Debian: Is it recommended to
> stay with stable or upgrade to sid?

Basically depends on your target audience:

* Stable is in "bug-fixes" mode only, so no new software will get into it,
  altho you can always create your private repository and spread the word
  around (see www.apt-get.org).
  
  Stable is mostly used by system admins who want a... well... stable system.
  Security upgrades are in place. Basically servers and new Debian adopters.

  As a side problem, new adopters might find the Debian release cycle a bit
  slow and move to testing when they cannot find the latest XFree or a similar
  piece of code.

* Unstable is where you will find the latest pieces of software: gcc3.2,
  libc2.3, latest kernel, ... Your piece of soft will eventually make its way
  to the next stable (if you catch the freezing timeframe).

  Unstable is used by Debian developers, mostly, and the upset users mentioned
  before (if, after being upset, they did not move to Gentoo ;)

HTH

mooch

-- 
Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429  7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Registered Linux user #66350 proudly using Debian Sid & Linux 2.4.20

It's called a change-over. The movie goes on and nobody knows the 
difference.
		--Narrator (Fight club)

Attachment: pgpRGyZSG3jiL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: