On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:31:34PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Why is this bug report filed on debhelper, which merely uses whatever > package names you give it? Opps, should have been against dh_make, I forgot it isn't part of debhelper. > See policy 11.3, paragraph 3. I don't know what this libpkg-guide is, > but it needs to be fixed to not contradict policy. Indeed, I suppose -dev packages without an SONAME are equally valid. Sorry for not RTFM. libpkg-guide is here: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html It was mentioned on the devel list while back. I don't think it's official but it should probably part of the maint-guide. They say including the SONAME is 'ideal'. cheers sam -- sam clegg :: samc@superduper.net :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP :: D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.5 2002/05/17 10:23:59 samc Exp $
Attachment:
pgpnY4DqdNyPQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature